<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XFCE 1, GNOME Shell 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jlebl.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/xfce-1-gnome-shell-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jlebl.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/xfce-1-gnome-shell-0/</link>
	<description>This blog is about nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 06:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlebl</title>
		<link>http://jlebl.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/xfce-1-gnome-shell-0/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlebl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 21:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlebl.wordpress.com/?p=538#comment-368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually liked gnome-shell in the beginning.  It looks cool.  But it&#039;s annoying to use.  I don&#039;t really care whatever it means to have a modern environment.  I mean, if a nonmodern is good, then just being new doesn&#039;t make it better.  I think many time things are changed just for the sake of change.  And often that leads to worse and not better results.  For example, consistency among applications seems now about as bad as it was when we started gnome (though there are a lot more applications now).  But about 3-5 years ago, Linux UI was reasonably consistent no matter what toolkit or desktop an app you used was written for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually liked gnome-shell in the beginning.  It looks cool.  But it&#8217;s annoying to use.  I don&#8217;t really care whatever it means to have a modern environment.  I mean, if a nonmodern is good, then just being new doesn&#8217;t make it better.  I think many time things are changed just for the sake of change.  And often that leads to worse and not better results.  For example, consistency among applications seems now about as bad as it was when we started gnome (though there are a lot more applications now).  But about 3-5 years ago, Linux UI was reasonably consistent no matter what toolkit or desktop an app you used was written for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markus</title>
		<link>http://jlebl.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/xfce-1-gnome-shell-0/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlebl.wordpress.com/?p=538#comment-367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is almost how i feel. i don&#039;t like gnome shell, unity or cinnamon. i would like to have modern, gnome-3 based desktop environemnt and i want to believe that gnome shell will turn into one some day. until then i think i will use xfce which is far from perfect but still better than the alternatives. KDE is an option but i like gnome applications better. kde feels a bit complicated, or that it has too many options/buttons everywhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is almost how i feel. i don&#8217;t like gnome shell, unity or cinnamon. i would like to have modern, gnome-3 based desktop environemnt and i want to believe that gnome shell will turn into one some day. until then i think i will use xfce which is far from perfect but still better than the alternatives. KDE is an option but i like gnome applications better. kde feels a bit complicated, or that it has too many options/buttons everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
