When reading news, one should do some quick calculations to test for ridiculousness. It really makes reading news far funnier. Let us look at the 19 billion dollar deal where Facebook bought WhatsApp. It is especially hilarious if we interpret this as how much do we as a society value WhatsApp versus some other things. These are based on just quick googling, but they are for just eyeballing the thing, not to be taken exactly.
1) Minimum wage hike. There are about 3.6 million people at or below mimimum wage  (2012 data). If we suppose that they would work 250 days a year for 8 hours a day, the current $2.85 proposed hike ($10.10-$7.25) would amount to . So about the same. Facebook could have paid everyone on minimum wage the hike for a year. But of course I’ve overestimated I doubt everyone on minimum wage works 8 hours a day 5 days a week.
2) NASA budget is about 16 billion in 2013 . So WhatsApp is actually worth more than all that NASA does in a year.
3) Nominal GDP . Czech Republic is about $196 billion. Ten WhatsApps is the GDP of the whole country of 10 million people (where WhatsApp has 55 employees, so 10 of them have 550 employees). Jamaica has nominal GDP of $13 billion or so. WhatsApp is way more than that. OK, you say, that’s just one year. Suppose that WhatsApp (what it does) works out to working for 5 years before it becomes obsolete. That’s 3.8 billion per year. The GDP of Cayman Islands is $3.3 billion. And that’s where Facebook is taking its profits to avoid paying taxes .
4) The University of California budget for 2013-2014 is $6.2 billion . WhatsApp would fund the UC for 3 years. WhatsApp apparently produces so much good for our society that it equals about the output of the entire UC system for 3 years.
I just got a new work laptop, the Dell XPS 13 developer edition. Even for a day installed GNOME 3 on it. Then I realized that I can’t work with two different desktops at the same time, so I went back to MATE. I can’t change my work computer to GNOME because the dual-monitor support is terrible in GNOME shell. Oddly it seems that dual monitor is a corner case for GNOME devs now. Strange as Linux is more used in the “workstation” market than “home desktop” market, and if I look around the offices here, whoever can (has funding) does have a dual monitor setup on their workstation. GNOME sucks as a workstation. It might be fine as a place to launch a web browser, email, chat, whatever it is that kids do nowdays.
The other thing is that this has a pretty high DPI, and EVERY desktop kind of sucks at this. I don’t think that mid 30’s is too old to use computers, but there are things which are definitely harder on this thing and require squinting. My eyesight is not what it used to be, but it’s not that bad. I can get most (but not all) fonts to be bigger. But for example chrome I can’t get to be bigger everywhere, that is, yes on the webpages, but no on the tab headers. Also UI elements in other things are tiny, like scrollbars are suddenly hard to hit because they are tiny. Why don’t these things also scale? That’s annoying. Smaller resolution is OK, but blurry and sucky.
Another annoying thing is this really godawful thing called a click-pad. It makes the assumption that just because you can do something, you should. So the top of the “buttons” are now also place where the “mouse” moves. So by pressing the button I am also moving the mouse, often clicking somewhere else. So now if I want to click on something two things happen: 1) the mouse jumps somewhere completely different 2) or I can’t hit it. Put that together with the small controls and you have a recipe for disaster. I continually click on things I don’t want to.
Ahh well … There are nice things about the laptop too, like the size, and the case. Though it doesn’t have a lock hole, which is really anoying … in a coffee shop, am I supposed to take the laptop to the bathroom with me? I know it’s small, but taking your laptop with you to pee is kind of weird. Oh yeah … ended on another complaint …